Twitter

Twitter (main account)

Facebook

Facebook

  • We know you LIKE us! Get stories directly in your News Feed, discuss them with your friends, and share your ideas with us!
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

  • Do you volunteer at the Gazette? Do you want to volunteer at the Gazette? Follow us on LinkedIn to connect with the current and former editors. Learn more about what it's like to work here and find out what some of us are doing post-UWO.
Twitter

Contact & Subscribe

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580

  • Unsubscribe at any time.

 

Era of Citizen Reporters

October 16, 2009
By

Unless you’ve been living in oblivion (and haven’t looked at the front page of this publication), you know the big buzz around campus is the video footage captured of Wednesday’s arrest of a student on campus and the reaction it has since received.
New media has changed the way we receive news — and whether this is good or bad, changeable or unchangeable, people need to be aware of it and increase their media literacy.
Today, anyone can be a reporter; they can use their phones to record events and have them uploaded on the Internet in a matter of minutes. While this allows for more “raw” information and immediate reaction, it often removes the context under which the event is taking place.
This is like using the most scandalous part of a quote as the headline of an article, which allows for people to put whatever spin they want on a video (case in point: the “Stop Resisting! Sparta Remix”).

Picture 4

As a result, people are quick to automatically assume beliefs such as “cops are brutal,” instead of considering an idea like “cops kept students safe.” And because accurate information often only comes out later, people have already made ignorant comments and constructed ill-informed opinions about the police. In this case, campus police assert they were trying to do their job properly and these videos may have tainted that image.
New media like this can further let the flood gates of uninformed opinion open to the public through comments and response videos. Without Wednesday’s YouTube video, the news media would have likely received an ordinary press release outlining the arrest,
remaining unaware of the intensity first-hand visuals can offer. As a result of these videos, however, traditional news media reacts in an over-dramatized way to keep people interested.
Still, as much as it would be beneficial for people to wait until they are fully informed to make comments, we cannot go back to the way news used to be provided. The solution to prevent misconstruing events, then, is in the hands of both the media and the individual.
Journalists have to be careful with how they present things. While news is meant to spark interest and reactions, it has to remain fair, balanced and aware of exaggeration.
At the same time, media consumers need to be better equipped and know how to properly read the news. They need to remember to keep context in mind and prevent gushing reactionary opinions.
And while shocking footage can create inflated and unnecessary hype, it can also spark some good conversation on possible real issues — if people let it.

Follow the Gazette on Facebook and Twitter.

The editorial board is comprised of editors and volunteers from the Gazette. Opinion articles written by the editorial board receive contributions from multiple Gazette writers and represent the paper's position on an issue.

2 Comments

  • Vote -1 Vote +1jody bailey
    says:

    “…if people let it”, that is the key point I dwell on because the actuality is that people often won’t let it happen; or simply cannot let it happen.

    The reality of this environment of ‘citizen reporters’ is that the – out of context – one sided video is seen by the majority of the public before the story is known.

    The inherent human nature of first impression bias just doesn’t allow those that saw the video first to completely rationalize the situation after the other side of the story is heard.

    The cornerstone of journalism is to provide facts in a fair an un-biased opinion, representing both sides of a story – eliminating first impression bias. The reality of ‘citizen reporters’ is to present the most sensational view as quick as possible it seems – which is at the heart of this issue.

    I completely agree though, it is the world we live in and it won’t change, only progress. Education on critical examination of ‘citizen reporters’ is all we can do at this point.

  • Vote -1 Vote +1Rex Taylor
    says:

    I am not sure what to make of this. On the one hand the video served to flame opinions, lacked context and explanation as well as description. On the other, should the visceral experience of the event be packaged, edited and assessed before it is being posted on an open public space?

    Surely the audience to the actual event also lacks the context and background and analysis to understand the event in a balanced way. Is the role of online video to relay the experience or represent the experience?

    There will be inevitable projection by the viewers in either case, but I am less clear about the processes of re-presentation. Part of the rise of citizen journalism is a backlash against the constant injection of perspectives and commentary stemming from editorial, ownership and institutional interests. How can you balance the immediacy of the evens with the inevitable distortion of retrospect?

  • You must confirm your comment via email before it will be posted.

About

  • The daily student newspaper at the University of Western Ontario in London.

Contact Us

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580