Twitter

Twitter (main account)

Facebook

Facebook

  • We know you LIKE us! Get stories directly in your News Feed, discuss them with your friends, and share your ideas with us!
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

  • Do you volunteer at the Gazette? Do you want to volunteer at the Gazette? Follow us on LinkedIn to connect with the current and former editors. Learn more about what it's like to work here and find out what some of us are doing post-UWO.
Twitter

Contact & Subscribe

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580

  • Unsubscribe at any time.

 

History gives value to boycotting

October 21, 2009

Re: “Pro-Palestinian doesn’t mean anti-Israel” Oct. 14, 2009

To the editor:

Letter-writer Leore Zimner rightfully deplores the “demonization” of Israel, but in doing so unfortunately throws the baby out with the bathwater by including the campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions amongst the offending activities.

When the same campaign was waged against the apartheid regime in South Africa, many conservative South Africans also complained they felt unfairly singled out in a region with its share of human-rights abusers.

Like Zimner, they also pointed to the fact that their country was the most advanced in Africa, with world-class science, technology, and medicine, and that, by virtue of this success, should be spared economic sanctions.

Had the world listened to them, the regime in Pretoria would have continued to crush the African National Congress, Mandela would have remained in jail and apartheid in South Africa would have continued to this day.

The author of the suffering of the Palestinian people over the past 60 years has been the Israeli government. Though this does not make Israelis bad people, the fact that the government builds towns, roads and housing for Jewish people only, while denying any civil rights to the occupied people means that all moral people have an obligation to make it change its behaviour.

History shows that a boycott is an effective non-violent strategy to accomplish this. To be Pro-Palestinian is to recognize this fact. If Zimner has a better non-violent strategy to bring an end to the occupation, she should propose it, before criticizing others.

—Wajid Sayeed
Medicine IV

Follow the Gazette on Facebook and Twitter.

2 Comments

  • Vote -1 Vote +1Ben Singer
    says:

    Sayeed,

    While I applaud your attempt to balance your comments, you have your facts mixed up. Israel, for security reasons, has ISRAELI-only roads, for Muslims, Jews, Christians or any other person holding Israeli citizenship. The Israeli government does not discriminate based on religion. The question is and always has been one of hostility coming from non-citizens. Trying to pose it as one of religion or race is simply incorrect.

  • Vote -1 Vote +1Wajid Sayeed
    says:

    Dear Mr. Singer

    That you consider such roads and colonies to have been constructed “for security reasons” when they are being built in territory that the entire world recognizes is not Israeli, demonstrates your lack of credibility on this matter. Unless you believe that Israel is not a “Jewish state” and that Jews should not be given preferential treatment where citizenship is concerned (which is the current law in Israel, under the “Law of Return”), your arguments ring not only hollow, but seem disingenuous.

    Sincerely,
    Wajid Sayeed

  • You must confirm your comment via email before it will be posted.

About

  • The daily student newspaper at the University of Western Ontario in London.

Contact Us

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580