Twitter

Twitter (main account)

Facebook

Facebook

  • We know you LIKE us! Get stories directly in your News Feed, discuss them with your friends, and share your ideas with us!
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

  • Do you volunteer at the Gazette? Do you want to volunteer at the Gazette? Follow us on LinkedIn to connect with the current and former editors. Learn more about what it's like to work here and find out what some of us are doing post-UWO.
Twitter

Contact & Subscribe

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580

  • Unsubscribe at any time.

 

There’s more to the QC tuition story

March 3, 2011
By

At a time when many are questioning how financially accessible education is in Canada – OK, mainly groups like the Canadian Alliance of Student Associations – Quebec’s ruling on the legality of McGill’s MBA tuition hike must be seen as a victory.

For those who don’t know, this year saw McGill hike the tuition fee for their MBA program nearly 900 per cent. Tuition for the two-year program cost $29,500 annually, even though the province mandates a cap of about $1,700 per semester. The decision to charge more sparked a bit of a row between the province and the school, with the Quebec government deciding yesterday to fine the school an amount equal to the amount taken in by the higher tuition fee.

Fun side-note: the students won’t be seeing any of that fine.

But that’s not the point at the moment – the issue is McGill’s original argument for higher tuition. According to the university, more money is the only way they’d be able to compete with other schools. In a world where most MBA programs will cost upwards of $60,000, it’s not too outlandish a claim.

It’s true Quebec has among the lowest tuition rates in the country, but its schools have also warned for quite some time of the financial difficulties of such low rates. In an ideal world, higher tuition means being able to afford better faculty and facilities. With the provincial government adamant about capping tuition rates, schools have to do more with less – something that will inevitably hurt students down the line.

Should McGill do as Western does and increase enrolment to provide more cash for the coffers? It’s perhaps the simplest solution but one that raises other issues like on-campus housing and student-to-teacher ratio.

I’m not arguing for higher tuition fees necessarily. There are far too many already barred from post-secondary education for financial reasons. But if provincial governments want to play hardball with their universities over tuition, they should also provide funding to ensure we students aren’t falling behind.

Follow the Gazette on Facebook and Twitter.

Mike Hayes

Mike is the Managing Editor of the Gazette. He's been with the paper as a volunteer in Volume 100, a News Editor from 101-102 and was a Senior Editor in Volume 103. He attended Western for a double major in English and Political Science.

You must confirm your comment via email before it will be posted.

About

  • The daily student newspaper at the University of Western Ontario in London.

Contact Us

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580