Twitter

Twitter (main account)

Facebook

Facebook

  • We know you LIKE us! Get stories directly in your News Feed, discuss them with your friends, and share your ideas with us!
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

  • Do you volunteer at the Gazette? Do you want to volunteer at the Gazette? Follow us on LinkedIn to connect with the current and former editors. Learn more about what it's like to work here and find out what some of us are doing post-UWO.
Twitter

Contact & Subscribe

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580

  • Unsubscribe at any time.

 

Evaluating our professor evaluations

March 22, 2011
By

It’s that time of year again — the time when power is put in the hands of the students to grade their professors. Scantron sheet are submitted in each class, where students must grade their professors on a variety of criteria and summarize their feelings about the class as whole. Ultimately, we hope, these evaluations will provide some kind of feedback that professors can use to improve their classes in the future.

Student attitudes towards their professors sway for a variety of reasons, whether it’s the quality of a lecture or their mark in the class. But grades fluctuate and depend as much on the difficulty of the test as the particular professor’s teaching skills. While it might not seem like best method, teacher evaluations are an appropriate way for the university to gauge student opinions.

When used poorly, students will inevitably use teacher evaluations as a cathartic process. Anonymous comments are the perfect way for students to release their pent up anger for a certain professor. But while this may be an elegant form of therapy, it’s hardly the best medium to express their frustrations. It begs the question as to whether students are best equipped to judge professors fairly.

When done well, however, it gives the university at least some kind of metric to bring praise or criticism to professors or instructors from an outside voice. After all, performance evaluations are used in every profession and while they can’t be perfect, they’re at least useful combined with peer review and other forms of evaluation.

Giving students a chance to offer feedback is a no-brainer, but how this data is used will depend on the professor’s willingness to accept criticism and look beyond the students who are just venting over poor grades.

Given they’re at least marginally useful for profs and quite useful for students, it would be sensible to add TA evaluations, possibly run through the faculty, since students often have more contact with TAs than professors.

Inevitably, teacher evaluations are most useful when the verdict is unanimous — when students voice a collective verdict, they can draw attention to unskilled professors who slip under the radar each year or give good professors the praise they deserve.

—The Gazette Editorial Board

 

 

 

Follow the Gazette on Facebook and Twitter.

The editorial board is comprised of editors and volunteers from the Gazette. Opinion articles written by the editorial board receive contributions from multiple Gazette writers and represent the paper's position on an issue.

You must confirm your comment via email before it will be posted.

About

  • The daily student newspaper at the University of Western Ontario in London.

Contact Us

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580