JesseAtGazette
MaddieAtGazette
AmberAtGazette
AaronAtGazette
CamAtGazette
CherylAtGazette
GloriaAtGazette
JasonAtGazette
JesicaAtGazette
JulianAtGazette
KaitAtGazette
KalAtGazette
NicoleAtGazette
NairaAtGazette
SophiaAtGazette
SlutWalk London is happening Sunday to protest the idea that sexual assault has something to do with what you wear. In January, a representative of the Toronto Police said, “Women should avoid dressing like sluts in order to not be victimized.” Critics say his comments place blame on the victims. Overall, we agree. No man has the right to sexually assault a woman, regardless of what she’s wearing. And in no way does a woman wearing a short skirt or a low-cut top suggest she’s asking to be verbally harassed or physically assaulted. But what sort of statement do we make with the clothes we wear?
Spring is here and with it comes skirts and tank tops. Unfortunately, they also bring unwanted glances from passersby.
A short skirt is apparently an invitation for a young woman to become a private show for anyone who happens to be walking down the street. Rather than simply moving on with their lives, it seems stopping, staring or catcalling are common courses of action.
I hate to break it to the world, but there are people behind those tube tops and miniskirts — people who just happen to like tube tops and mini skirts. People who don’t necessarily like being stared at and judged.
I don’t think it’s a lot to ask to ask people not to stare at a woman when she chooses to wear a favourite skirt out to the bar. The problem isn’t with her wearing a miniskirt, it’s the way those around her react. She’s turned into some sort of impromptu art exhibit instead of the living, breathing student who may have just finished her midterm.
Many people argue women are “asking for it” when they wear their miniskirt out to the bar and are ogled. But what really needs to be asked is why we’re okay with a peek of skin becoming an invitation to treat women like meat. Would people be allowed to act same way if she were in her sweats?
A woman should be able to wear whatever she chooses without the fear of being judged or gawked at. It shouldn’t matter if she’s wearing her sweatpants or a tube top.
— Cheryl Stone
Clothing speaks volumes — and so does a lack of it. Let’s face it, dressing like a Victoria’s Secret model on the sweaty Ceeps dance floor has a certain sexual connotation attached to it.
So why do women complain when men start treating them like sexual objects?
Sexual predators are not the norm and the majority of men are decent guys. But they’re also sexual beings, and the idea that they can completely refrain from ogling a near-naked woman – particularly while under the influence of alcohol – is a laughable notion.
Of course, there’s a line that should be drawn. Sexual assault is unequivocally wrong and catcalling women on Richmond is juvenile. But ladies, don’t blame men for focusing on your body instead of your brain when that’s what you’re showing off on a night out.
As women, we need to consider our choices. If you’re busting out of a bustier, don’t tell me you’re not trying to titillate. Looking sexy often implies you’re looking for sex. And even if you’re not, dressing in such a suggestive fashion is like holding a sign saying, “Look at my body!”
I say this as a modern woman who enjoys wearing the latest trend, be it high heels or short skirts. But I’m under no illusions that men will look at me the same way if I’m wearing a mini-dress instead of a turtleneck.
And I can’t fault them for that – I choose my own outfits.
— Lauren Pelley
$#!@*%^% says:
Lauren is right. Despite what every girl will tell you, there are many who dress in a scantily-clad fashion because they WANT attention. It’s the same reason some guys buy a polo shirt 3 sizes too small so their biceps are stretching the armholes to capacity.
Obviously there is no excuse for sexual assault and the uncouth practice of catcalling is something to be despised…but the world is full of dickheads. I shouldn’t have to put up with someone cutting me off in traffic. I shouldn’t have to put up with jerks talking on their phone in class. I shouldn’t have to put up with someone hogging the only sink in the bathroom so they can style their hair. I guess my point is that the only reason it still happens with such regularity is because we haven’t deemed it be unacceptable. Rarely do I see someone step up and say “Shut up, that’s rude” when a guy makes a derogatory remark about a girl. It’ll only change if we stop ignoring it and make the effort to ostracize the perpetrators.
@Scott_Penny says:
Nicely written, as I was surprised that a demonstration is coming to London, after Toronto. Sometimes people have one thought and intention in mind, but don’t think of the 1% that can harm your psyche for life.
Everybody wants to have fun, looking good and getting attention. But we need to be thinking about class and not so much a**(self censored).
Holli-Lynne Elash says:
In response to Lauren Pelley’s comment that “Looking sexy often implies that you are looking for sex”. The reality is that women are often deemed ‘sluts’ regardless of what they are wearing. This label often has more to do with the notions of sexuality and the insecurities of the person doing the lableing then it does with the person being labled. Absolutely the human body is a beautiful thing and those who admire it can hardly be faulted for doing so. There is however a difference between admiring respectfully and degrading or strictly objectifying. The notion that the way a person dresses is in any way responsible for the behaviour of others is exactly the myth that the Slutwalk is trying to dispel. The argument you put forward is not very far from the defense used by perpetrators. For example it is not to long ago that a short skirt was considered a legal defense for rape in this country. Can you imagine if a bank robber used, “the bank wanted me to rob it, why else would it be flaunting it’s money?” as a defense. Gender based crimes continue to be the only crime where the survivor is further victimized by being asked to morally defend their actions. I also want to add that my choice to wear a bustier is about the pleasure I get from feeling the cool air on my warm bosom and has nothing to do with you or anybody else. Furthermore, if a person is unable to behave in a respectful manner when drinking then perhaps their decision to drink should be scrutinized, rather than the person who is being mistreated.
- Holli-Lynne Elash
2010-2011 V-Day Producer and Slutwalk London Organizer
Elaine Murray says:
I like diamonds, love to go to jewellery stores and look at them. I actually get a physical reaction, go into a trance and fantasize about owning them all.
If I smash the show case and take off with the diamonds, do you think the jeweller or the police are going to blame the beckoning glistening diamonds, or me, for taking them?
There are lots of things in this world we may desire, that belong to other people, it doesn’t mean they are ours for the taking.
Elaine Murray says:
I like diamonds, love to go to jewellery stores and look at them. I actually get a physical reaction, go into a trance and fantasize about owning them all.
If I smash the show case and take off with the diamonds, do you think the jeweller or the police are going to blame the beckoning glistening diamonds, or me, for taking them?
There are lots of things in this world we may desire, that belong to other people, it doesn’t mean they are ours for the taking.
Z says:
I agree with Holli-Lynne. Pelley’s comment “looking sexy often implies that you are looking for sex” is so dangerous I am shocked it was printed in the paper. A better example than a bank would be a man in well-cut suit being robbed. Will he be questioned about where he was walking, at what time, how many people were with him, how was he talking, what was he talking about etc etc rape and sexual harassment almost always lead to victim blaming. Picking a part what she or he did when this type of attack occurred. I am a virgin, if I am wearing a tank top to a bar does this mean I am looking to get groped or get raped? no.Even if I was sexually active, it still doesn’t mean I deserve that type of violation. Pelley is the unfortunate result of rape-culture which needs to be deconstructed. Pelley sickens me and seeing that she is mastering in journalism I hope she never covers a rape case as she is sure to demonize the victim. Probably like this http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-nyt-gang-rape-article-mentions-victim-age-11-wore-makeup-and-dressed-ol/
Elaine Murray says:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/London-Abused-Womens-Centre/18498385154464
London Abused Women’s Centre-”A young girl in grade six attended a pre-teen dance last weekend and wore a bright pink ‘SLUT’ necklace around her neck. Little girls shouldn’t know or identify with that word and shouldn’t watch their female adult peers walk the streets cheering and singing as if it’s a word to be celebrated.”
Yes, I would be wanting to seek out help from this organization who believe the little girl in grade six deserved to be beat up for wearing a necklace that said slut. Not a word about the violence foisted upon her by her peers who beat her up.
Absolutely horrifying how the rape and violence culture against females is condoned by the the very institutions that victims would seek help from.
Megan Walker says:
The London Abused Women’s Centre posted a comment on its facebook wall regarding a young girl in grade six who attended a pre-teen dance wearing a bright pink “slut” necklace.
There was no mention of “violence foisted upon her by her peers who beat her up.”
This story telling is consistent with Ms Murray’s posts on the London Free Press, the SlutWalk facebook wall, altlondon.org and other blogs. Her sole intent is to defame the London Abused Women’s Centre and it’s Executive Director. We would respectfully ask you to remove her comments and monitor them accordingly in the future.
Sincerely,
Megan Walker
Executive Director
Christine says:
Lauren, I caught your advert on Twitter for your “head-to-head” today. Since I have written into the Gazette over the years to disagree with your opinions on abortion and glass-ceilings I figured I would check out your opinion on Slut Walk and women’s clothing.
My general reaction was, *yawn*. I’d have to go talk with you to find out if this is really your opinion or if you are just towing the general “women who dress a certain way are just asking for attention” line to create controversy. Congratulations, because either way it worked.
What I find disappointing is how this head-to-head completely missed the point of Slut Walk. If you wanted to have a debate in the Gazette about this event there are a multitude of opinions going around that embody what you and Cheryl claim to agree on (that sexual assault is not the fault of the survivor) but diverge on the execution of making change.
In other words, there are feminists out there that both agree and disagree with this form of protest and search for empowerment. You could have talked about that. Instead you took the easy way out and took stance of blaming women for how they dress while trying to convince us that you AREN’T blaming women for how they dress.
It’s just typical and unimaginative.
I do hope you and Cheryl both come out to Slut Walk this weekend. I think there is a lot you can learn from it and we can start having an honest discussion of what motivates sexual assailants, as well as about power, privilege, and empowering women and men to end sexism and violence so that we can leave these sexist, victim blaming tropes behind.
$#!@*%^% says:
I think people are taking Lauren’s comments out of context. As far as I can tell she isn’t trying to “blame the victim” or use a woman’s choice of dress to justify the actions of others at all, but rather she is simply stating a cold reality. For example, if I walk around Highbury at 2AM on a Friday night by myself…there’s a good chance I’m going to be jumped. Maybe I just like the area, or maybe I like the smell of that fresh industrial air and have no interest in being mugged. It doesn’t matter. I’m still likely to get my ass kicked.
We live in an imperfect world, and while I commend the women who strive to make it more egalitarian…I believe some of you need to step out from your fantasy worlds and accept the harsh reality of the situation. We’re all well aware of how prevalent sexual assaults are in society, so take steps to protect yourself. I wholeheartedly believe you SHOULD have the freedom to dress however you please without fear of being degraded or attacked, but that’s not always a guarantee. There are despicable people everywhere, so if you’re going to walk around in a bustier in public, you should at least take appropriate measures to safeguard yourself. If catcalling bothers you that deeply, sue them for verbal assault. I guarantee they’ll watch their mouth after that.
inb4 100 thumbs down
Whitney says:
‘Rape Culture’ is exactly what it is-
Womyn are walking around regurgitating opinions that have been fed to them through the media.
Rape/Sexual Assault/Coercive Sex/Verbal Assault is not ok- period. The end. Finito. We are continually having this discussion, whether womyn should be held accountable for negative advances- lets end that. Take back our voices.
It’s not about whether our clothing elicits attention or not. Lets shift our conversations to the men who are committing these offenses and what needs to shift in our culture to teach THEM to stop.
sphinctourist says:
I think what gets me the most with opinions like Lauren’s and comments like those posted by $#!@*%^% is the hopeless resignation underlying them both. They might as well be saying “Yeah we live in a rape culture, but that’s just how it is. You just need to get over it and deal.” All you offer in the way of a solution is “How To Cope With Living In A Rape Culture” rather than anything even approaching “How To End Rape Culture”. It’s really quite sad.
One can easily make the argument that clothing or a lack thereof “speaks volumes”, it just won’t be a very credible argument. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that it’s not the clothing *doing the talking*, it’s the preconceived notions, ideas and prejudices of the *listener*. Ideas like “that’s a slutty outfit”. Notions like “she must be in the mood if she’s dressed like that.” Even the very idea of a *slut* and the entrenched prejudice that goes hand in hand with it.
*Slut* by it’s very definition is a misogynist term. If you look it up, it apparently only applies to women. Women who are openly sexual, or who have a sex life that is deemed inappropriate for no other reason than because she is a woman. There is NO corollary standard applied to men. Any woman who gets slapped with that label is instantly devalued and dehumanized. That is how rape/sexual assault becomes acceptable, and is directly related to how it happens.
It’s not about an outfit or showing some skin. Rape culture is what manifests when misogyny becomes commonplace. Every single person that buys into and reinforces a different set of standards of behaviour for women is guilty of helping perpetuate rape culture.
$#!@*%^% says:
I think what gets me most with opinions like sphinctourist’s is their inability to see past their own narrow-minded conceptions of this debate. I’ll try to spell this out for you in a manner that even a child could understand:
1.) Nobody here is condoning rape. At all.
2.) I am a realist. I acknowledge that our world is not perfect. That doesn’t mean I ACCEPT it, but merely that I’m AWARE of it.
3.) This is not a problem that’s going to disappear over night. We’re in a transitional period right now. For the time being, Canadian society is still patriarchal and therefore certain prejudices associated with it still persist.
4.) Try to think of this issue from a more practical standpoint. Take my example regarding being mugged.
Again, I’ll repeat this so you really can’t misinterpret it: nobody here is condoning rape. Nobody here is BLAMING the woman for being raped. However, by dressing a certain way she is increasing the probability of such an act occurring. That’s all I’m trying to say. It’s not nice. It’s not right. It’s not the woman’s fault, it’s the fault of the rapist. Don’t be stupid. Don’t put yourself into a situation that increases your chances of being raped. This is a basic formula for avoiding victimization in any number of crimes, not just rape.
Now, please tell me what you don’t understand about that.
Clara says:
Statistically, dressing “provocatively” does NOT increase one’s chance of being raped. Remember that.
sphinctourist says:
I think what gets me most with opinions like $#!@*%^%’s is their inability to contribute anything more than ignorant misconceptions to this debate. I’ll do you the favour of spelling them out for you in an easily digestible format, although I make no guarantees that any of this will get through to you:
“Nobody here is condoning rape. At all.” I can’t speak for the others, but I never said that about you. Most of what I had to say was directed at Lauren, but given your latest rant, it’s plain to see that the concept of rape culture and how it relates to the occurrence of rape is completely lost on you.
What is rape culture? It’s a culture where rape and other sexual violence are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media condone, normalize, excuse, or encourage sexualized violence. For example: a female rape victim being blamed for her being raped because of how she dressed or acted. How do people bring themselves to blame victims like that? Are people really that cruel? Nope, they are just raised in a culture that promotes rape myths. Let me give you an example that I’m pretty sure you’ll recognize:
Myth: Women “ask for it” by their dress or actions.
FACT Rapists look for victims they perceive as vulnerable, not women who dress in a particular way. Assuming that women provoke attacks by where they are or the way they dress IS victim-blaming. No person, whatever their behaviour, “deserves” to be raped.
Now what was it that you said? Oh yeah “by dressing a certain way she is increasing the probability of such an act occurring.”
Let’s just substitute *increasing the probability of* with *partly responsible for* as both versions are saying exactly the same thing. You can’t say you’re not blaming the victim while throwing an obvious rape myth in there. It kills your credibility. It speaks to the fact that you have not done your homework on the subject at hand.
You can claim to be a realist until you’re blue in the face, but the fact here is you have no real solution to offer here beyond how to cope while living in a rape culture. That’s not realism, that is defeatist rhetoric at it’s finest. How’s this for a solution: END rape culture.
Stop buying into and perpetuating myths about rape for starters. Start opening the lines of dialogue with other men about consent. Stop tolerating the use of *slut* as a pejorative. Learn to see women as equals and treat them as such. Teach that to the men in your life. These are all things that EVERYONE could and should be doing.
No, this not a problem that’s going to disappear over night. Yes, we still live in a patriarchal society. Ultimately though, it doesn’t matter. There’s plenty to be done here and now by you, by me, by everyone.
One thing though, if you’re genuinely interested in helping to change the world for the better for the women in your life, you are in need of more education on the subject at hand. In case you hadn’t noticed, I’m not the only one here that’s been knocking down your ideas. Some of us here know a fuckload more on this subject than you.
------- says:
(excuse me while I post my thesis in the comments section)
$#!@*%^% says:
Thanks for re-typing Chapter “X” from your Women’s Issues textbook for me.
Keep tossing around your ‘key terms’ like “rape myth” and “rape culture”, but it doesn’t change the fact that dressing a certain way draws more attention to a woman, and therefore increases the probability of a rapist taking an interest in her. Like I said, this principle applies to any number of crimes. Placing a massive television and $10,000 stereo in front of your living room window for everyone to see will attract the attention of burglars. Walking around Highbury wearing a Rolex and an Armani suit will grab the attention of nearby muggers much more than if you were dressed in sweatpants and a hoodie. Parking your Audi TT in a dark and empty parking lot overnight will attract far more attention from thieves than if it were a rusted ’91 Tempo.
Of course there are other factors that come into play, such as the woman’s level of vulnerability as you are well aware, but her manner of dress is a contributing factor whether you like it or not.
(Also, inb4 you bitch and whine about how I supposedly objectified women by using these examples)
------- says:
@ $#!@*%^%
Maybe if you spent more time copying and pasting definitions from Wikipedia like sphinctourist you’d be an expert on rape too. Clearly you haven’t spent 20 minutes googling “rape culture” and “rape myths” like they have, so you’re speaking out of turn. Please do your internet-based homework before you contribute an opinion to this anonymous comments section that has no impact on the real world.
Naatu says:
I do not doubt that most people have good intentions when passing along advice on how women can “prevent rape”. The problem is that it’s not up to them.
It’s uncomfortable for people to think that women have no control over whether or not they’ll be victims. If women would just wear less revealing clothing, if they just wouldn’t go to bars, if they just wouldn’t go to house parties, if they just wouldn’t flirt, if they just wouldn’t dance to the music, if they just wouldn’t get so drunk, if they just would watch their drinks to make sure no one slips them something, if they “insert blah-dee-blah” here, then they would have been safe. This is a lie. If they did any or all of those things, maybe they wouldn’t have been raped, and someone else would have been instead. Or maybe they would have been raped anyways. They didn’t make the decision to get raped – someone took that decision away from them.
This does not mean that rape is inevitable – it means that we need to focus on strategies that *will* end rape. We need to put out more messages of “Don’t Rape” than we do “Don’t Get Raped”, because the latter is not working. We need to spend more energy on challenging the attitudes that some women are more worthy of respect and freedom from sexual assault than others. We need to have these conversations about what consent is, about what harassment is, and what constitutes rape. And we need to challenge our peers and people we interact with when they, through ignorance or otherwise, perpetuate these toxic attitudes that allow rape to continue.