USC pushing for gender neutral bathrooms

October 20, 2011 7 Comments »

There’s only one in the University Community Centre, there are another two in Weldon if you know where to look, and there’s only 18 of them on the entire Western campus.

This is after the University Students’ Council was promised to eventually see 70 gender-neutral bathrooms on campus.

According to Marissa Joffre, vice-president campus issues for the USC, in 2008 a list of 70 single stall bathrooms were given to the vice-president at the time, with the promise 10 of these would have signage indicating they were gender-neutral by the end of the year. Each year after would see 10 more bathrooms converted.

“If you’re stressed about going to the washrooms this campus isn’t accessible,” Joffre explained. She noted trans people could face violence, or even have to out themselves when using one of the single-gender bathrooms on campus.

“It is commonplace for transgendered individuals to develop bladder and kidney infections because they do not feel they are safe using single-sex washrooms,” Stephanie Armstrong, director of gender diversity and awareness with PrideWestern, explained. She noted gender-neutral bathrooms were not just for people who did not fit the dual-gender norm, but people who wanted more privacy or may need to wash before prayer would also benefit. Joffre noted her goal was to have the spaces available to whoever wanted to use them, whether the individual was out or not.

Armstrong is currently working with the transgendered community to create an inclusive symbol to label the new washrooms. Joffre explained by the end of the year she was hoping to be able to put a pamphlet in the Support Services Centre.

As Armstrong explained, providing the gender-neutral space is half the battle.

“As someone who has tried finding the gender-neutral washrooms between classes or on break during class, I know that these are often in the back corner of a building,” she said. “If there were more gender-neutral washrooms on campus with better signage, finding and using these washrooms would be easier for students and would support inclusivity on campus.”

Joffre admitted part of the stall on the part of administration may have been because past vice-presidents have had other priorities. “I feel like someone needs to be pushing this forward.”

She explained the administration had been receptive to this issue since she brought it up again, but she was left to figure out why the issue had been put on the back burner by the University.

Armstrong explained the bathrooms were one of many important steps to an inclusive campus.

“I do think it is a step in the right direction and sets an important precedent for supporting the diverse community that Western values so much.”

 

    7 Comments

    1. +14 Vote -1 Vote +1David Kim
      December 15, 2011 at 9:05 pm -

      1. “@David is was actually 90+”

      I never said your high school average wasn’t a 90+.

      2. “the gazette already lacks readership and a story of this nature as a cover is not benefitial reaching new students”

      Unless you’re against new knowledge, exactly how would this article be non-beneficial to students? The large majority of students are unaware of LGBT issues (let alone trans issues), and that is reason enough to make this front page.

      3. “I have no real opinion on what gender one is whether by choice or not… That is none of my business.”

      I agree with you here. Don’t comment on things of which you have no real opinion of. The students who care will rightly do the commenting.

      Lastly, I don’t know how “English-as-a-second-language-students” have collectively hurt your feelings in the past, but we apologize for your idiocy. (Also, it’s beneficial*, derogatory*, you’re*, and institution*.)

    2. -15 Vote -1 Vote +1Kyle
      November 17, 2011 at 2:21 am -

      (click to show comment)

    3. -11 Vote -1 Vote +1Kyle
      November 17, 2011 at 2:04 am -

      (click to show comment)

    4. +9 Vote -1 Vote +1Stephanie Kapusta
      October 31, 2011 at 12:48 pm -

      Before I came to Western, I was pleased to read of the plan to assign more gender neutral washrooms. But when I arrived in 2010, I realized that the promise had not been implemented. Let’s hope it will be this time. Thanks to Marissa and Stephanie for putting this back on the agenda.

    5. +17 Vote -1 Vote +1David Kim
      October 24, 2011 at 10:49 pm -

      @Kyle
      Actually read the article; maybe then you’ll understand its significance.

      If you’ve already read it… hate how even ignorant idiots with 80%+ averages are admitted into UWO.

    6. -19 Vote -1 Vote +1Kyle
      October 23, 2011 at 12:14 pm -

      (click to show comment)

    7. +14 Vote -1 Vote +1Erving Goffman
      October 20, 2011 at 11:10 am -

      I never really understood why single-stall bathrooms would need to be assigned to a specific gender in the first place. Multiple stall bathrooms are obviously a different story, but if it’s just for one-person use they should be converted to unisex immediately. It’s a move that offers convenience for everyone.

    Leave A Response

    Related Posts