Twitter

Twitter (main account)

Facebook

Facebook

  • We know you LIKE us! Get stories directly in your News Feed, discuss them with your friends, and share your ideas with us!
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

  • Do you volunteer at the Gazette? Do you want to volunteer at the Gazette? Follow us on LinkedIn to connect with the current and former editors. Learn more about what it's like to work here and find out what some of us are doing post-UWO.
Twitter

Contact & Subscribe

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580

  • Unsubscribe at any time.

 

Harper hating on the environment

November 16, 2011
By

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is putting the economy before the environment again. There have been rumours flying around for several weeks now that Harper plans to cut more than 200 million dollars in funding for research and monitoring of the environment, yet he plans to spend more than 60 billion dollars on new military jets and warships.

These rumours began after an article was published in Nature, a British scientific journal, which discussed the proposed cuts to Canadian environmental research and monitoring, with a particular focus on cutting ozone monitoring. Canada’s ozone monitoring network was instrumental in discovering the first ozone hole over Canada last spring and is internationally renowned.

Throughout Harper’s tenure as prime minister, he has made it blatantly evident that he does not care about Canada’s environment and has made it difficult for the media to publicize environmental issues. In 2007, Harper introduced a new rule to control journalists interviews with Environment Canada scientists. According to an internal analysis report released in 2010, this new rule resulted in an 80 per cent drop in media coverage of climate change science. Canadians pay taxes to support government programs and services, and cutting millions of dollars from environmental research and monitoring is harmful to the environment and to Canadian citizens.

Environment Canada measurements indicate that the ozone hole over the Arctic resulted in lower ozone over most Canadians this summer, and UV levels were about three to five per cent higher than previous years. These results alone speak to the importance of researching and monitoring Canada’s ozone hole.

Thomas Duck, an atmospheric scientist at Dalhousie University, spoke out about Harper’s proposed cutbacks stating, “T he proposed cuts go so far the network won’t be able to do serious science.”

Harper appears to be digging himself deeper into an environmental hole as he cuts important environmental programs and approves an environmentally damaging pipeline. His decisions might not have immediate effects, but they will be detrimental for generations to come. Cutting ozone research and monitoring runs the risk of allowing the ozone hole to continue to develop and put the health of Canadian citizens in jeopardy.

Environment Canada has been speaking out since the rumours of the potential cutbacks saying “Nothing has been cut. We are optimizing and streamlining the way we monitor and measure ozone.”

What does optimizing and streamlining really mean? To me it sounds like more bullshit coming out of Harper’s mouth so that the media doesn’t have a field day with his decision to cut funding.

Harper and his conservative government are putting Canada at risk of environmental destruction, but is doing so in a way that leaves the Canadian citizens in the dark.

Follow the Gazette on Facebook and Twitter.

Amber Garratt

Amber is the Managing Editor of the Gazette. She has been with the paper since she was a volunteer in Volume 102. She became an Arts & Entertainment Editor for first semester of Volume 103 and an Arts & Life Editor for Volume 104. She graduated Western with a B.A. in Geography.

5 Comments

  • Vote -1 Vote +1Anyone But Harper
    says:

    With Harper, this is not surprising, and to those who never cast a ballot, you can’t complain.

    Next election, youth must band together.

    We must take Canada into our own hands.

    We’ll be leading Canada in the future; may as well start now.

  • +12 Vote -1 Vote +1Erving Goffman
    says:

    I believe Harper is planning to close that hole in the ozone with his ego.

  • -2 Vote -1 Vote +1Prove your point
    says:

    Money and research won’t save the environment. Only you can.

    I don’t really care if Harper does cut funding to environmental studies. When they can get ordinary people to first appreciate- as in, actually go out and appreciate- nature, and then adopt environmentally friendly lifestyles (putting your hundred tin and plastic containers in the recycling bin doesn’t count,) then I think Harper would have a little more respect for them.

  • +5 Vote -1 Vote +1Here's your proof
    says:

    Research absolutely is needed for environmental protection. Research discovered that CFCs destroy ozone. Without research we would have just kept on using them for refrigeration. Research has since confirmed that without a ban on CFCs the ozone layer would have been mostly destroyed by 2065, with severe consequences for the natural world (of which we are part). So, “Prove your point”, maybe *you* don’t care, but you should be pretty thankful that people back in 1987 (when the Montreal Protocol was signed) did. Hopefully people 25 years from now don’t rue our current ignorance.

  • +1 Vote -1 Vote +1Improving Tomorrow
    says:

    Canada has roughly a third of the world’s arctic ozone monitoring stations, and hosts the world archive of ozone data, relied on by scientists around the world. The single staff member running the entire archive has been given a lay-off notice. This is consistent with the Harper government’s vociferous attacks on science and scientists; Environment Canada scientists are prevented from communicating with the public at all unless given approval and ‘approved lines’ of script from the PM’s office, and university scientists not working for EC directly are punished by things like lack of funding if they speak to any public media. Coverage of climate science in Canadian media has declined more than 80% during his time in office, and he has made us the industrialized country working hardest to block international action on climate change. Scientific knowledge can’t be treated as a political inconvenience: the laws of nature can’t be negotiated with or ignored because we simply consider them inconvenient.

  • You must confirm your comment via email before it will be posted.

About

  • The daily student newspaper at the University of Western Ontario in London.

Contact Us

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580