Twitter

Twitter (main account)

Facebook

Facebook

  • We know you LIKE us! Get stories directly in your News Feed, discuss them with your friends, and share your ideas with us!
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

  • Do you volunteer at the Gazette? Do you want to volunteer at the Gazette? Follow us on LinkedIn to connect with the current and former editors. Learn more about what it's like to work here and find out what some of us are doing post-UWO.
Twitter

Contact & Subscribe

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580

  • Unsubscribe at any time.

 

We’re not quite at flying cars yet

February 9, 2012
By

Growing up, I always envisioned the future being similar to The Jetsons with high-tech houses, moving sidewalks and flying cars, but as I’ve grown older, I’ve come to realize this may never be the case.

Don’t get me wrong—society has come a long way in my 22 years on earth, with the advancement of bulky word processers into a thin the MacBook Air and the development of land line phones into multifunctional iPhones and BlackBerries.

But realistically, North America can only develop so much before we hit a wall. This wall I speak of is metaphorical, but will exist at an intersection between the advancement of our society technologically with our advancements socially.

I don’t foresee North American society advancing so far that we are driving around in flying cars, while thousands of people in Africa are dying because of malnutrition or while clear social issues exist in Canada, such as the divide between the rich and poor.

I cannot imagine a world where people in Toronto don’t need to walk anymore because there are moving sidewalks everywhere or have the ability to fly to Florida in the matter of hours in their flying cars, while across the Atlantic Ocean in Senegal people are worrying about basic health issues like contracting malaria.

According to the World Health Organization, in 2005 there were approximately two million cases of malaria and more than 2000 deaths attributed to the disease just in Senegal.

If this doesn’t mean much to you, just think on average, 487 Canadians will be diagnosed with cancer every day. With numbers like these I would rather see people finding ways to combat malaria and cancer rather than spending their time and money inventing and mass producing a flying car.

What benefit would a moving sidewalk or a flying car have if our society is not healthy, or people are living below the poverty line? I believe that as we will continue to advance technologically, but not socially, and we will reach a breaking point—a very dangerous breaking point.

In the 1989 film Back to the Future II the filmmakers predicted that by 2015 we would have hoverboards, thumbprint currency and flying cars everywhere, yet we are far away from reaching the Back to the Future II predictions and, to be honest, I don’t want to live in that particular world.

My hopes for the future have changed since my childhood dreams for a Jetson-esque utopia, but I think my dreams are much crazier than a flying car.

I hope for a world where a divide between the rich and the poor does not exist, for medicine to advance so that malaria, HIV and AIDS are not a daily concern for a large proportion of the population, and a world where people don’t fight over religion, money or resources—but realistically, a flying car might be more feasible.

Follow the Gazette on Facebook and Twitter.

Amber Garratt

Amber is the Managing Editor of the Gazette. She has been with the paper since she was a volunteer in Volume 102. She became an Arts & Entertainment Editor for first semester of Volume 103 and an Arts & Life Editor for Volume 104. She graduated Western with a B.A. in Geography.

You must confirm your comment via email before it will be posted.

About

  • The daily student newspaper at the University of Western Ontario in London.

Contact Us

  • Visit the UCC, Room 263 (map)
  • Visit the contact page
  • Call us at 1 (519) 661-3580