JesseAtGazette
MaddieAtGazette
AmberAtGazette
AaronAtGazette
CamAtGazette
CherylAtGazette
GloriaAtGazette
JasonAtGazette
JesicaAtGazette
JulianAtGazette
KaitAtGazette
KalAtGazette
NicoleAtGazette
NairaAtGazette
SophiaAtGazette
London could be allowed to party louder and later with the possibility of changing noise bylaws. City council met on Monday night to discuss raising the noise limit from 90 decibels to 105 decibels and pushing quiet hours later than 11 p.m. for special events.
Dale Henderson, counselor for Ward 9, needs more convincing these changes are in the best interest of Londoners. “I want to hear the rationale and I’m not interested in 1 o’clock personally [...] I think there will be some more people unhappy if we go longer or go louder.”
Henderson is interested in a more moderate change and said the current discussion within city council is about asking questions. “We’re trying to make the city function the best we can.”
According to the Galen Carol Audio website, 90 dB is comparable to a train whistle at a 166-metre distance, and 105 dB is like a chainsaw one metre away.
According to Patrick Searle, vice-president of university affairs for the University Students’ Council, “The USC encourages the city to adopt a more realistic noise bylaw that reflects the wants and needs of its population.” He said that the USC’s measurement of O-Week’s loudest sounds hit about 88-92 dB, but the USC’s measurement often varies from the London police readings.
To avoid any bylaw violations, the USC purchases a special permit from the city each year in anticipation for O-Week noise. All the events held on campus during that week are an exception to the noise by-law with this permit. This permit is different from what is used for other events across London. London’s accommodations for Western’s O-Week is an advantage to all parties, according to Searle, because it encourages the USC to keep their events on the Western campus and keeps first year students on campus in a central location for this week.
Searle emphasized it is important for London by-laws to accommodate everyone. “Our students, just like many citizens in London, do not go to sleep at 11 p.m. A bylaw that respects both the reality of a population that enjoys entertainment well into the night, and the population that doesn’t, would help London reach its potential.”
Nicole D’Alessandro, vice-president of student events for the USC, said there is no way this potential bylaw change could negatively affect O-Week events. “If this bylaw was to change, this would be good for the program [...] the better the entertainment we can offer on campus, the more students that stay for it and we believe that it’s better to keep our first-years on campus than off campus.”
Erving Goffman says:
“The right to swing my fist ends where the other man’s nose begins.”
Have fun, stay up late, blast your music and get loaded…but find a way to do it that doesn’t interfere with other peoples’ lives. If you can’t, you need to find a new hobby.
Sean says:
“The USC encourages the city to adopt a more realistic noise bylaw that reflects the wants and needs of its population.”
No offense to Pat, but honestly which population is he talking about? The party population or the population of London?
I realize we’re a University/College city, and there are many students who live here. But can we remember we’re not all partiers. I get annoyed enough sometimes with people yelling down my street during O-Week and Homecoming, I’d prefer not having them all the time or a booming noise around the corner because of a raise in decibel level allowance.
Keep the parties inside where they belong by keeping the decibel level where it is.
James says:
@Erving & Sean
In a society that has become increasingly tolerant of dickish behaviour, this article doesn’t surprise me one bit. It is, however, surprising that someone as seemingly level-headed as Pat Searle would condone such an idiotic proposal. Essentially he’s stated that “some people like to party really hard, and if you don’t like it, tough”.
Kev says:
The USC was publicly against the city allowing townhouses to be built close to campus. Those townhouses would have provided students cheap rent and a short trip to class. The USC was against it because they wanted maintain respect among the London community. Searle explained with that respect the USC could champion other issues. This article has shed some light on what issues the USC thinks are worth fighting for.
So there we have it folks, the USC gave up the chance to have affordable housing so we can party louder.
sad.